Why “Kind of Bloop” is not fair use

Or one well-researched opinion, at least. After I posted (here) about The Online Photographer’s take on it, I was hoping an intellectual property lawyer would explain in more detail why declaring that the pixel-art album cover probably wasn't fair use.

One did.

The discussions around transformative works and the protected elements of a photograph are particularly valuable.

(Via The Online Photographer)

Am I doing it wrong?

Comments? I don’t do open comments. Life is too short.

If you have something to say, get in touch via .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) or on Twitter.